2008年第14 創刊第419            05/7-05/13/08

 

Table of content - 本期重要目录

Upcoming Events and Call for Participation

v    好莱坞星光大道"支持2008奥运会游行活动"具体安排 (LA 5/10)

v    第三届“春晖杯”中国留学人员创新创业大赛

v    The 3rd Chunhui Cup Pioneering Competition for Overseas Chinese Scholars

v    第十届海交会、第五届商交会将于518日至22日在福州举行

v    欧洲选拔月球宇航员 精通英语男女不限 (5/19)

v    [CCS-NEWS] UCLA China Center E_Newsletter - May 2008

v    玉山科技協會年會暨論壇 探討娛樂及互動媒體科技的發展趨勢 (5/17)

v    中華之聲國劇社全本〝群英會 (5/25)

v    USCI Talking Points: May 2008

v    美国华裔医学科学家协会-Asian Pacific American Federal Career Advancement Summit

News and Announcements

v    张云大使为洛杉矶领区11 位中国优秀自费留学生奖学金颁奖 (附图)

v    常州市委书记范燕青率团访问洛杉矶会见留学人员、华裔专家及商界精英 (附图)

v    華人之光 - 胡玲當選美國家科學院院士

v    Chicago to expand foreign language programs in Chinese, Arabic and Russian…

v    仗义执言的女学者:王文畅教授对CSUN总教务长等人关于CNN和西藏问题的对话

v    教授来稿 - “科学人才观”浅说 (邓伟志)

v    方李邦琴捐资1600万助北大对外汉语教学

v    Creative learning: Tennessee school uses blogs to teach writing, computer skills

v    学者投书: 为什么中国正在走、本应该走、将继续走自己的路

v    美国《纽约时报》:中国留美学生为祖国形象而战

v    布希總統簽署 - 宣布20085月為亞太裔傳統月

v    Museums further science education, American experts say

v    UCLA研究表明"皮肤干细胞"可分化成心血管细胞

v    全球专家拟绘癌症基因图谱 开辟个案化治疗新时代

v    日研究称一吨废弃手机能提取150克黄金

v    Online gaming builds critical thinking, decision-making skills, US educators say

v    自由翱翔不再是梦 墨西哥研发背负式直升机

v    日本科学家开发出"新型生菜" 可合成抗过敏物质

v    数据:中国教育部发布《2007年全国教育事业发展统计公报》

v    Insight from Scholars Net Expert: Today's Market Commentary (Evans Y. Lam)

v    国务院学位办主任杨玉良院士:中国博士培养速度过快 半数以上去当公务员

v    中国科协最新研究报告:中国科技人才流出量仍然大于流入

v    挺進前瞻性科技研究領域 台灣同步輻射研究中心 30日進駐成大

v    International Conference on Differential Algebra & Related Topics

v    新官上任就急于出政绩 内地官场短跑心态很浮躁

v    61日起内地居民持奥运签注可在港澳逗留90

v    美蓋洛普訪問10萬國民 近半不滿現狀  消費者信心指數下跌至5年低位

留学、考试、人才、及签证

v    美国签证:中国留学生如何避免因移民倾向拒签

v    熟悉美国签证技巧十拿九稳 留学准备签证提示

v    关于GRE考试2008-2009年度报名的通知

v    部分亚洲国家和地区GRE考试将改为笔试

v    GRE作文想拿高分 必须掌握八大要点

v    美国华裔医学科学家协会: Job Opportunities - Clinical Director

 

============================================== 

好莱坞星光大道"支持2008奥运会游行活动"具体安排 (LA 5/10)
 
游行主题:支持北京08奥运,反对媒体歪曲报道
游行集合地点:好莱坞星光大道 Hollywood Kodak Theater
游行时间:2008510(本周六)下午1点至4
主办单位:南加州支持2008北京奥运会活动组委会

 
联络方法:
www.support2008olympics.com
 
集体报名,特别要求,义工人员请 联络associations@support2008olympics.com
个人报名,http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/support2008olympics?user=Your+email
捐款请访问www.support2008olympics.com
 
详细安排计划
横幅,旗帜,标语牌,展板等宣传资料:组委会已经充分准备了所需的横幅,旗帜(中国,美国以及奥运旗帜),标语牌,展板等宣传资料。参与集会人员可以现场领取标语牌和旗帜。如果您愿意自制宣传资料,以下标语信息可供您参考。
 1. one dream, one world
 2. Support 2008 Olympics
 3.
Support Olympics - No Politics
 4. Peace Olympics - No Politics
 5. Stop Racial Discrimination
 6 report news, no lies

 
游行集合地点是在Hollywood Blve, Kodak
Theater门前的人行路上。本次组委会已经准备了统一制作的奥运帽,组委会将在现场免费发放。请穿着运动休闲,展现奥运精神。
 
 
具体议程如下:
1. 个人可以直接去现场, 我们建议大家使用公交,开车的朋友,趴车请参考我们的游行地图。
2. 一点钟开始,大家陆续在KODAK THEATER门口的的马路站好,组委会将分发奥运帽,标语牌,旗帜,和气球。
 
31点半,游行正式开始,组委会代表发表演讲,同时合唱,喊口号,我们会准备speakers和喇叭。准备合唱歌曲。现场发放歌词。
4145,开始游行,游行路线如附件所示(沿Hollywood Blvd向东,在 Vine St.过街,然后从Hollywood
Blvd的另一面人行道回到回到出发地)
53—4点,在集合地我们有支持奥运签名活动以及歌曲表演等等。
 
6,同时组委会组织了支持奥运车队。
6、解散之后大家自由活动。
 
本次集会的注意事项:
1、本次集会的主题是:支持北京奥运,呼唤媒体公正。本集会属于自发组织,参会人员自愿参加集会。
 
2、欢迎自带跟本次主题相关的标语牌和国旗等。
 
3. 游行组织工作人员将佩戴胸牌,请集会人员配合相关组织人员的引导工作
 
4. 游行将走人行道,不占用车行道路,游行路线中有五个节点,提供饮水及医疗服务。
3、我们准备了一些问答的提纲给大家做参考。请做好被采访的准备。但是任何个人未经允许请勿以集体名义向媒体发表观点,立场。
4、我们会在集会的地点发送旗帜和标语牌等宣传品,集会完成之后请归还给组委会。
6、本次是和平集会,绝对禁止携带武器,禁止出现焚烧,辱骂,暴力等任何违背和平原则的事情发生;一旦发生这些行为,将交与警方处理,责任事项由当事人自己全权负责。
7、我们已经有两个扩音器用来维持秩序,统一行动,未经允许请不要私自使用扩音器。
8、天气炎热,请自带足够的饮用水。组委也会提供水以及现场医生急救服务。
9、请注意环境卫生,保持会场清洁。谢谢支持
 
10,组委会设置了移动卫生间在Vine St.Hollywood Blvd交口。
11、请尽量不要迟到
 
南加州支持2008奥运活动组委会
www.support2008olympics.com

2008-5-4

==================================================

第三届“春晖杯”中国留学人员创新创业大赛

 

各在外留学人员社团组织:

 

由教育部、科技部共同主办的第三届“春晖杯”正式开始报名,报名时间为2008428日至728日。即日起报名者可登录“中国留学网(www.cscse.edu.cn, www.cscse.com.cn)”在线报名。

 

请各留学人员联谊会、学会、协会、专业技术社团组织等广泛地向会内的留学人员选传第三届创业大赛事宜,并将第三届“春晖杯”创业大赛开始报名的消息在各自的网站上面刊登出来,大赛启动的消息请见附件。

 

对各在外留学人员社团组织的帮助,我们表示衷心的感谢!如您对大赛有何意见和建议,请来信与我们联系。为确保第三届春晖杯创业大赛启动的消息及时送达贵会,防止因缺乏中文插件而无法看到消息内容,我们同时随函附上大赛消息的英文版本,仅供参考。

 

 春晖杯”创业大赛组委会办公室

     联系人:汪天洁、张凤宇

     电话:+86-10-82370953+86-10-62317331

     传真:+86-10-82370953

     电子邮件:cyds@cscse.com.cn;cyds@cscse.edu.cn

     地址:北京市海淀区学院路15号教育部留学服务中心学一楼107207

     邮编:100083

 

第三届“春晖杯”创业大赛的承办单位是教育部留学服务中心、科技部火炬中心、中国留学人员广州科技交流会组委会办公室、大连高新技术产业园区管委会;协办单位由北京、上海、广州、大连、苏州、西安、威海、昆山、东莞等9个城市的12家留学人员创业园,以及IDGVC技术创业投资基金、欧美同学会商会、神州学人编辑部等单位组成。中国驻外使(领)馆教育处(组),海外留学人员联谊会、协会、学会等社团组织为大赛支持单位。

 

“春晖杯”创业大赛是一个政府搭台、相关部门通力协作,留学人员、专家、机构、企业唱戏的成功案例,也是进一步贯彻落实党和国家的留学政策,为留学人员回国工作和为国服务搭建平台、开通渠道的一个重要实践。2008年第三届“春晖杯”创业大赛将在总结前两届大赛经验的基础上,努力为留学人员回国创业搭建更为宽广的项目对接平台,提供更好的服务。“春晖杯”创业大赛期待着更多的海外留学人员关注和参与。www.cscse.edu.cn  , www.cscse.com.cn

 

主办单位:教育部、科技部

承办单位:教育部留学服务中心、科技部火炬中心、广州留学人员科技交流会组委会办公室、大连高新技术产业园区管委会。

协办单位:北京中关村国际孵化园、上海张江国家留学人员创业园、留学人员广州创业园、大连海外学子创业园、苏州留学人员创业园、上海莘闵留学人员科技创业园、威海留学人员创业园、西安留学人员创业园、昆山留学人员创业园、中国北京(望京)留学人员创业园、东莞留学人员创业园、北京经济技术开发区(汇龙森)留学人员创业园、IDGVC技术创业投资基金、欧美同学会商会、神州学人编辑部。

支持单位:驻外使(领)馆教育处(组),海外留学人员联谊会、协会、学会等社团组织。

www.cscse.edu.cn  , www.cscse.com.cn

============================================

The 3rd Chunhui Cup Pioneering Competition for Overseas Chinese Scholars

The 3rd Chunhui Cup Pioneering Competition for Overseas Chinese Scholars started off on April 28th, 2008. The announcement was made at a press conference in Beijing, on April 28th, 2008. The online registration period for the Competition lasts from April 28th to July 28th, 2008. All interested parties or persons are welcome to register for the Competition on the website www.cscse.edu.cn or www.cscse.com.cn .

 

The Chunhui Cup Pioneering Competition for Overseas Chinese Scholars is a program, sponsored by the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Science and Technology, P.R.C.. The Competition is to boost the entrepreneurship of overseas Chinese professionals, and pave the road for them to establish high-tech enterprises back in China.

The 3rd Competition is undertaken by Chinese Service Centre for Scholarly Exchange, Torch High Technology Industry Development Center under the Ministry of Science and Technology, Organizing Committee Office of the Guangzhou Convention of Overseas Scholars in Science and Technology, and management Committee of Dalian High Tech Industrial Zone. Besides, a total of 15 nationwide pioneer parks, business incubators, venture capital firms, news media and other organizations have joined hands to make this competition possible.

The following is a list of sponsors, undertakers, coordinators and supporting organizations for the 3rd Competition:

Sponsors:

- Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China

- Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China

Undertakers:

- Chinese Service Centre for Scholarly Exchange

- Torch High Technology Industry Development Center under the Ministry of Science and Technology

- Organizing Committee Office of the Guangzhou Convention of Overseas Scholars in Science and Technology

- Management Committee of Dalian High Tech Industrial Zone

 

Coordinators:

-         Beijing Zhongguancun International Incubator Incorporation

-         Shanghai Zhangjiang Overseas Chinese Students Pioneer Park

-         Guangzhou Entrepreneur Park for Overseas Chinese Scholars

-         Dalian Overseas Scholars Business Incubator

-         Suzhou Pioneer Park for Overseas Chinese Scholars

-         Shanghai Xinmin Overseas Chinese Science and Technology Pioneer Park

-         Weihai Pioneer Park for Overseas Chinese Scholars

-         Xi’an Pioneer Patk for Overseas Chinese Scholars

- China Kunshan Pioneering Park for Overseas Chinese Scholars

- China Beijing (Wangjing) Pioneer Park for Overseas Chinese Scholars

- Dong Guan Pioneer Park for Overseas Chinese Scholars

- Huilongsen International Business Incubator (Beijing) Co, Ltd.

-         IDG Technology Venture Investment

-         WRSA Chamber of Commerce of China

-         China Scholars Abroad

 

Supporters:

-         Educational Departments/Offices with Chinese Embassies/Consulates

-         Overseas Chinese students associations, academic and social organizations.

 

The Chunhui Cup Pioneering Competition for Overseas Chinese Scholars has proved to be obviously effective. According to the feedback of the contestants of Chunhui Cup Competition, 77 award-winning projects have grown into high-tech enterprises or come under rapid development in China, thanks to the promotion of the Competition.

The 2nd Competition for 2007 accepted 230 online registered projects, 172 of which passed the appraisal of the Competition. At the end of December, 2007, 138 contestants, whose projects had survived the appraisal, got financial support from the Competition and gathered in Guangzhou to attend business symposiums, discussing their business proposals with interested pioneer parks, venture capitals, enterprises, etc..

We warmly welcome more overseas Chinese scholars to take part in the 3rd Competition. The online registration period is due on July 28th . Any interested person or party may log in onto our website www.cscse.edu.cn, www.cscse.com.cn for online registration.

Contact Information:

Address: Chinese Service Centre for Scholarly Exchange

Persons to contact: Wang Tianjie, Zhang Fengyu, Dai Zhengming

Telephone: +86-10-82370953, 0086-10-62317331

Fax: +86-10-82370953

E-mail: cyds@cscse.edu.cn, cyds@cscse.com.cn

===============================================

第十届海交会、第五届商交会将于518日至22日在福州举行

本届海交会将立足“区域化、国际化、专业化、市场化、信息化”的定位,举办对台经贸政策发布会、两岸产业合作高峰论坛,展示台湾县市风采和两岸光机电、动漫创意产业优势产品等。 本届海交会力争在两岸船运直航、大陆居民赴台旅游、两岸贸易便利化措施等方面实现突破,争取在海交会期间率先实现台湾参展参会人员和货物直航抵榕;争取国台办推出的最新政策和措施在海交会上发布实施。本届海交会已争取到国台办、海关总署、质检总局、中国贸促会作为海交会的常年主办单位,商务部作为支持单位。

 

本届海交会还将配套举办高规格的“五大论坛”、“三项对接”及“两大主题日”活动。台湾参展企业将增至近百家,5个国际友城代表和美国、德国、英国等13个驻华使领馆代表团,美国、日本等24个国家及香港、澳门地区重点客商代表,侨商代表,异地商会闽商代表,海西协作区浙江、江西、安徽39个城市和本省各设区市都将组团参会。

 

  海交会展区设置突出“海峡”主题,中心展馆由台湾县市映象展、两岸光电机产品展、两岸动漫创意产业展3个展区构成。截至目前,已确定参展的台湾县市有19个及金马澎3个县,参加展示的县市总数超过台湾县市总数的一半以上。    今年商交会将有355家境外企业参展,设3个展馆,分别是进口馆、品牌馆、家居工艺馆。商交会将继续秉持“促进两岸合作、加快经贸交流、展示海峡西岸”三大宗旨,加强专业化招商,广泛吸纳两岸三地及粤、赣、浙等周边省市企业参展,增强海西对外辐射和影响力。

================================================

欧洲选拔月球宇航员 精通英语男女不限 (5/19)

 

欧洲航天局(ESA)正在选拔飞向月球的新一批宇航员。选拔工作在17个成员国展开。其对象既有男性,也有女性。这是近16年来该航天局宣布的首次选拔。据Welt Online网站报道,欧洲航天局正在德国挑选“4名勇敢的宇航员”并希望能从几万名应征者中选出优秀的人才,尽管这是一次严酷的选拔。“被选中者”将成为首批飞向月球的欧洲人。

根据欧洲航天局通报,该组织首次开展宇航员选拔工作的原因是准备开创一个新时代。而欧洲人飞向月球则将成为新时代的开端。

应征者应当符合高标准要求。其中,不仅要受过高等教育,而且还要具有在科研单位多年工作的经验。将优先考虑在自然科学领域工作的工程师和科研人员。此外,必须精通英语。要求具有良好的身体素质。年龄为2737岁。候选者将进行许多医学心理测试。

有意者将于19日前在网上报名、填写和发送申请表。欧洲航天局希望德国能提交1万多份申请表。

http://www.esa.int/esaCP/index.html  

===================================

[CCS-NEWS] UCLA China Center E_Newsletter - May 2008

 

UCLA Center for Chinese Studies

 

eNewsletter

Month of May 2008

 Dear friends:

The highlight this month is a performance by -- and discussion with -- the Mei Lanfang Beijing Opera Company.

Below is a complete listing of events this month.  We look forward to seeing you!

Best,

David Schaberg, Yunxiang Yan, Richard Gunde, and the Center staff

Cultural Developments during the Han Dynasty & Early Chinese Drama

A talk (in Chinese) by YAO XIAO'OU (Communication University of China)
Thursday, May 8
4:30 pm - 6:00 pm
243 Royce Hall
learn more about this event »

What Is Sinophone Studies?

A colloquium on Shu-mei Shih's book Visuality and Identity: Sinophone Articulations across the Pacific, featuring COLLEEN LYE (UC Berkeley) and YINGJIN ZHANG (UC San Diego)
Friday, May 16
4:30 pm - 6:00 pm
11377 Bunche Hall
learn more about this event »

Anecdote, Gossip, and Occasion in Traditional China

A two-day international conference
Friday and Saturday, May 16 and 17
Admission by invitation only
learn more about this event »

China Undisciplined

A two-day interdisciplinary graduate student conference
Friday, May 30
1:00 pm - 5:00 pm
314 Royce Hall 

Saturday, May 31
9:00 am - 5:00 pm
314 Royce Hall
learn more about this event » 

Extramural Events

The Non-Profit Sector in China in the 21st Century: Practice, Challenges, & Trends

A talk by AILING ZHUANG
Friday, May 9
10:30 am
MRF, 1st floor, UPC
USC, 669 W. 34th Street, Los Angeles 90089
learn more about this event »

===================================================

玉山科技協會年會暨論壇 探討娛樂及互動媒體科技的發展趨勢 (5/17)

玉山科技協會將於517日(星期六)下午3 時至晚上9 時在阿罕布拉市的Almansor Court舉辦6周年年會暨「娛樂及互動媒體科技的發展趨勢」論壇會。

互動式娛樂則是發展最迅速的產業,網路遊戲又是互動式娛樂業最迅速發展的板塊。規模大、成長快。這個存有爭議的產業,在投資者的推動下,一個全新的商業模式,正在蓬勃進展。在中國已有8 個網路遊戲公司上市。美國在2007年的年銷售額超過好萊塢,達到179億美元,遊戲已超過電影、電視,成為最重要的娛樂產業之一。

 

中國的網遊行業發展,不斷挑戰人們的想像。2007年中國網路遊戲市場規模為128億元, 2006年增長66.7%,網路遊戲玩家已超過3300萬。預計在未來的4-5年間,網路遊戲還將繼續保持20%以上的增幅,在2011年整個市場規模將達到401億元。網路遊戲也同時成為迅速致富的途徑,在短短3個月內,完美時空、金山、巨人、網龍等4家本土網游公司接連在海外上市,網遊在2007年已經表現出傲人的成績。

南加玉山科技協會在六周年年會特別策劃與媒體有關的「娛樂及互動媒體高科技的發展趨勢」論壇會,邀請中美互動娛樂界的權威行業專家與您深度探討互動娛樂和遊戲行業的秘密,分析行業的經驗和故事。就娛樂高科技的發展與趨勢、契機與面臨的挑戰、下一波投資的商機等話題展開演講和對話,進行深入的討論,目的就是為南加地區的朋友與媒體企業家搭建一個平臺,提供交流學習的機會。

 

論壇邀請到的講員包括:

陳鎬民博士,Univessence Digital Studios的執行長。香港出生,威斯康辛大學數學博士,曾在阿波羅、貝爾實驗室任工程和管理職務,擁有很多專利,也是 Peritus軟體公司CEO,曾將兩家公司帶上NASDAQ

關耀強,主導全球遊戲的出版公司Vivendi Game 資深執行副總裁,主要負責開發機臺式遊戲, 線上遊戲及手機遊戲的發行新管道、平臺和商業模式,熟撚購並,通過積極的購並和投資,建設國際銷售通路以確保該公司業務的快速成長。他曾任Gemstar電視指南的國際副總裁,負責國際管道、IPG,和互動式服務;也曾任新媒體集團,負責將影片和電視引入新科技的運用,譬如可選視訊VOD;曾任微軟公司的MSN 和數位媒體部發展經理,數字媒體諮詢的專家顧問。USC畢業和加州大學 伯克萊分校J.D.Boalt 霍爾法學院)。

冷瑞麟,目前擔任美國遊戲公司THQ的全球品牌經理,負責發展互聯對戰即時戰略遊戲「英雄連」和許多其它成功的遊戲,有多年遊戲和娛樂業的經驗,是這個領域的專家。

王利鋒,北京萬方幸星數碼科技總裁,主導專業動畫及電影電視特效製作公司,作品有周星馳的《功夫》,李連傑的《功夫之王》以及吳宇森的《赤壁》。他在20歲就完成了不列顛哥倫比亞的電腦科學碩士,隨後在加拿大動畫和遊戲領域工作。90年代中期,他帶領一支專業團隊製作了紀錄片《圓明園》動畫,開創了中國動畫的先河。幸星的客戶包括迪士尼(Disney)等諸多國際知名的數位娛樂公司。

張宇慶,Thsale 美國區總經理,網路遊戲、電子商務和社交網路的專家,Thsale.com是網上遊戲出版者和世界最大的多人線上角色扮演遊戲的貨幣提供者。

詳細資料可上網 www.scmj.org 或洽 Pola 黃蘭桂 626 320-7210或吳志鴻 cchwu@wclawyers.com

======================================

中華之聲國劇社全本〝群英會 (5/25)

CHINESE OPERA ASSOCIATION

3327  San Gabriel Blvd. #D, ROSEMEAD,  CA  91770  USA

Tel: (626) 576-5055  Fax: (626) 280-8303  Email: unitedam@gmail.com  

 

      南加州僑界國劇聯歡會---全本〝群英會〞

 

  : 2008525(星期日)下午2

  : 聖蓋博市立劇場 (320 S. Mission Dr., San Gabriel)

  : 全本〝群英大會〞三國故事。孔明、周瑜、曹操、關羽、魯肅等英雄人物同登舞台,象徵台灣廣大〝菁英〞群起,為同胞拼經濟、振民生。

  : 海峽兩岸三地名伶名票聯合演出!

  : 南加州僑社團體聯合主辦,成立演出委員會,共襄盛舉。

  : 中華之聲國劇社  張裕東   626-576-5055

====================================

USCI Talking Points: April 30 - May 14, 2008

USC U.S.-China Institute

Talking Points
May 7-17, 2008

05/09/2008: The Non-Profit Sector in China in the 21st Century: Practice, Challenges and Trends
MRF 1st Floor, UPC
669 W. 34th St., Los Angeles, CA 90089
Time: 10:30am
Dr. Zhuang will speak on some challenges facing the non-profit sector in China in the 21st century. 

California Events

05/07/2008: The Taiwan Elections: Implications for the Future
Stanford University
Philippines Conference Room Encina Hall 616 Serra St., 3rd floor , Stanford, California
Cost: Free
Time: 12:00 PM - 1:15 PM
Alan Romberg will analyze the impacts of Taiwan’s recent elections on the three legs of the U.S.-PRC-Taiwan triangle. 

05/08/2008: Cultural Development during the Han Dynasty & Early Chinese Drama
UCLA 10383 Bunche Hall
Time: 1:30 PM - 5:00 PM
A talk given by Yao Xiao'ou, a professor of the Institute of Literature, Communication University of China about the development of early Chinese drama in the Han Dynasty. 

05/08/2008: Music and Mission in 18th C. China: Sonatas & Letters of Teodorico Pedrini
Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco
Address: 750 Kearny Street, Third Floor, San Francisco, California 94108
Cost: Free
Phone: 415-422-6401
Time: 6PM
Drs. Allsop and Lindorff will explore the music and lettres of Teodorico Pedrini, an Italian composer and missionary at the Chinese imperial court from the 18th century. 

05/09/2008: Msuic & Culture: Chinese-Western Musical Exchange from the 16th-20th Centuries
University of San Francisco
Harney 232 , San Francisco, California
Cost: Registration required, $30; USF faculty, staff, & students, Free
Phone: 415 422-6401
A symposium featuring the exchange of Chinese and Western music from the 16th-20th centuries. 

05/09/2008: Intellectual and Cultural Trends in China--a roundtable conversation
Stanford University
Address: Okimoto Conference Room, Encina Hall East, 3rd Floor , Stanford, California
Cost: Free
Time: 12:00 PM - 1:15 PM
Four leading Chinese scholars from East China Normal University will lead a discussion on mentalities, thoughts and grassroots life in China

North America Events: 

05/09/2008: The Future of Democracy in Hong Kong
Asia Society and Museum
725 Park Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, New York
Cost: $15 students w/ID; $15 Asia Society members; $30 nonmembers
Phone: (212) 517-ASIA
Time: 8:00 - 9:30 am  
Join us for a breakfast briefing on the future of democratic reforms in the Hong Kong, SAR. 
 
05/10/2008: Maritime Asia in the Early Modern World
University of Washington
Address: Simpson Center for the Humanities, Communications 202
Cost: Free
Time: 9:00AM - 5:00PM
This symposium considers the connections of maritime Asia to world history in the early modern era and China’s relations with Southeast Asia in particular. 
 
05/12/2008: China's Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation
Asia Society and Museum
725 Park Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, New York
Cost: $10 students w/ID; $10 Asia Society members; $15 nonmembers
Phone: 212-517-ASIA
Time: 6:30 - 8:00 pm
Author David Shambaugh discusses the strengths and weaknesses, durability, adaptability and potential longevity of China’s Communist Party. 
 
05/14/2008: Exploding Chinese Art: The Economy of Art/The Art of the Economy
Asia Society and Museum
Address: Auditorium, 725 Park Avenue, New York, New York
Cost: $10 Asia Society and Guggenheim Museummembers; $12 nonmembers; $10 students; seniors
Phone: 212-517-ASIA
Time: 6:30 - 8:30 pm 
This panel will discuess the 'economic explosion' reflected in Chinese art and economy. 

Exhibitions: .  

01/23/2008 - 05/15/2008: Cycle of Life: Awakening - Works by Asian Women Artists
IEAS Gallery
2223 Fulton Street 6th Floor, Berkeley, CA
Email: ieas@berkeley.edu
An exhibition featuring the art works of Asian women artist.

 

USC U.S. – China Institute
3535 S. Figueroa St.
FIG 202
Los Angeles, CA 90089-1262
Tel: 213-821-4382

Fax: 213-821-2382

Email: uschina@usc.edu

Website: http://china.usc.edu 

==========================================

美国华裔医学科学家协会-Asian Pacific American Federal Career Advancement Summit
http://www.nsms-caa.org/

SEVENTH ANNUAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN FEDERAL CAREER ADVANCEMENT SUMMIT

On May 15, 2008, U.S. Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao, in partnership with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, will host the Seventh Annual Asian Pacific American Federal Career Advancement Summit in Washington, DC.  The Summit, the first of its kind, was developed in 2002 to address the shortage of Asian Pacific Americans in senior executive and management positions in the federal government.  The Summit focuses on providing management insights, skills training and other career opportunities to help Asian Pacific American government employees maximize their potential.

The U.S. Department of Labor is once again partnering with the Federal Asian Pacific American Council and Federal agencies to offer expanded programming and training workshops and to reach a broader audience.  The Summit reflects Secretary Elaine L. Chao's commitment to enhancing the Department of Labor's community outreach and career development initiatives.

Online Registration to attend the Summit and Executive Coaching Registration are NOW OPEN.  Thank you for your interest in the Summit, and we look forward to seeing you on May 15th.

AGENDA:

7:30a.m. - 9:00a.m.        Registration and Continental Breakfast / Visit Exhibit Hall

                                        Executive Coaching

                                        NEW! Breakfast for Champions: Video Training Series

9:00a.m. - 10:15a.m.       Opening Plenary Session

10:15a.m. - 11:30a.m.     Workshop Session 1

12:10p.m. - 1:30p.m.      Luncheon Program

1:30p.m. - 2:00p.m.        Video Training Series / Visit Exhibit Hall

2:00p.m. - 3:30p.m.        Workshop Session 2

3:30p.m. - 5:00p.m.        Workshop Session 3

5:00p.m.                        Conference Concludes

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management has certified that the 2008 APA Summit qualifies as training in compliance with the Government Employee Training Act (5 USC Chapter 41).  Your supervisor may require this memo in order for your attendence at the APA Summit to be credited as training. http://www.apasummit.gov/

美国华裔医学科学家协会 (NSMS-CAA)
http://www.nsms-caa.org

============================================

张云大使为洛杉矶领区11 位中国优秀自费留学生奖学金颁奖 (附图)

 

54日,中国驻洛杉矶总领事馆在总领事官邸举行“2007年度洛杉矶领区国家优秀自费留学生奖学金”颁奖仪式。张云总领事、黄晓健和许朝友副总领事、李曜升教育参赞以及领区内各主要大学的中国学生、学者代表、部分获奖学生的亲朋好友等出席。张云总领事向十一名获奖学生颁发了《国家优秀自费留学生奖励证书》和奖学金,并代表总领馆向获奖学生表示祝贺。他表示,相信同学们会以此为新的起点,刻苦学习,不断积累,将来更好地报效祖国,服务社会,贡献自己的聪明才智。

 

本次获得该奖学金的同学有:亚利桑那大学江林华、加州大学尔湾分校张彦彦、加州大学圣芭芭拉分校车骁、斯克里普斯研究院李昂、加州理工学院崔涛、张昭宇、孙贤开、朱林、梁伟,加州大学洛杉矶分校姚彦、南加州大学郑小明。本次《国家优秀自费留学生奖学金》的评选活动是中国连续第五年为在外留学人员设立国家奖学金,涉及范围包括美国、英国、日本、德国、法国等30多个中国留学生比较集中的国家。奖励对象是在国外攻读博士学位、年龄在40周岁以下的优秀自费留学生。2007年度共有301名留学生获得“国家优秀自费留学生奖学金”奖项。

 

姜镇英教授、佘振苏教授、陈钧铭教授、黄焕中教授、金华教授、李百炼教授、谢天蔚教授、吕倩教授参与了本次洛杉矶领区中国优秀留学生奖学金的初选评审工作。

 

 http://www.usqiaobao.com:81/qiaobao/res/1/20080505/37361209975559271.jpg

 

五四青年节之际,洛杉矶总领馆总领事张云(后排左五)亲自为在其领区内自费留学的中国留学生颁发奖学金。此次获奖学生共11人,每人获得奖学金5千美元。洛杉矶总领馆领区包括南加州、亚利桑那州、新墨西哥州和夏威夷州。

===============================================

常州市委书记范燕青率团访问洛杉矶会见留学人员、华裔专家及商界精英 (附图)

523日,常州市经贸代表团在洛杉矶举行两场会议。范燕青在会间指出,常州要以更加开放的姿态、更加开放的环境、更加优异的服务来吸引海外人才回国创业,进一步推进常州经济社会发展走向更高层次。中国驻洛杉矶领事馆张云大使、副总领事许朝友及市领导戴源、韩九云在会上作了发言和介绍。

 

52日范燕青一行专门来到位于洛杉矶的南加州大学生物医药中心,看望海归人才胡培声博士。南加州大学生物医药中心长期从事抗体工程领域的研究,掌握着世界上最先进的抗体工程技术,该中心胡培声博士研究的两个生物医药抗肿瘤项目已经签约成为常州市第二批领军型海归创业人才项目。范燕青与胡培声博士进行了亲切交谈,他希望胡培声博士与常州企业密切合作,为常州生物制药产业的发展作出贡献,常州市各级政府也将给予积极支持。胡培声博士表示,对常州的创业环境和政府的服务感到满意,对将自己的研究成果早日实现产业化充满信心

  美国洛杉矶地区有很多著名院校,高层次海外人才较多。有的则是听到消息后专程从外地赶来的。市委书记范燕青感谢大家的到来,他说,有这么多高层次海外人才前来参会,说明大家对祖国及我们常州的发展都很关注,有强烈的报效祖国,发展事业的愿望,常州将努力为海归人才创造一个良好的创业环境、平台和载体。

  范燕青说,改革开放已经走过30年的历程,经济社会发展要走向更高的层次,就必须吸引更多人才,特别是高层次的海外留学人员参与到我们创新创业的队伍中来。目前高层次海外人才回国创业的机遇很好,应该看到,我们国家正在发生深刻的变化,这个变化就是重要的社会转型期,表现在文化的多元化、包容性比以往任何时候都强;依法治国的理念正在深入人心。作为常州来讲,为建设创新型城市而实施的“千名海归人才集聚工程”,就是要以此充实常州的传统文化,逐步使文化的多元性更强,增强城市的发展活力,注入长期的、无穷的发展动力。

范燕青指出,要重振常州雄风,再创常州辉煌,产业升级是关键。先进装备制造、新材料、电子信息、新能源、生物技术及制药等五大产业已列为常州未来发展的重点目标。常州欢迎在座高层次海外人才带着朋友、同学、同事到常州来创业,各级政府和部门要以更加开放的姿态、更加开放的环境、更加优异的服务来吸引人才,加快完善机制体制,不仅要让高层次人才“引得进、留得住、用得好”,更要让他们在常创业“有舞台、有前途、有利益”。

姜镇英、胡培声、陈钧铭、薛亚平、王吉成、李先进、刘金、玫公勒、姚应梅、王海潮、鄺仲豪、朱晓丹、洪海、王霄飞、叶伟、刘大海、郑小明。。。等三十多名专家和学者出席了会议。

 

与会人员对常州良好的创新创业环境充满兴趣,纷纷就海外人才到常创业的优惠政策以及创业渠道进行咨询,有的还对常州怎样才能更好地吸引高层次海外人才提出了建议。美国绿色原野公司首席执行官程裕富博士此次带来了生物柴油、节能设备两项环保技术,他希望在常州能找到合作伙伴一起开发,并建议常州就急需项目建立项目库。经贸代表团成员在会上当场回答了他提出的问题,市外经贸局就这两项技术与程裕富博士进行深入的沟通,期望项目最终落户常州。常州经贸代表团务实高效的作风受到了大家的热烈欢迎。在美国已创办公司的陆学琪博士在生物医药方面有一个专门研发团队,因为同学已经成为常州首批16个领军型海归创业人才,所以对常州有着良好印象,这次他是专门驱车两小时从其它城市赶来。他说,他是江苏人,从南京大学留学美国,他知道南大已在常州设立研究院,说明常州的科研环境好,专业人才充裕,投资环境良好,所以他已打算把公司搬到常州去发展。通过半天的会议,已有一批留美人员表达了到常州创业发展的愿望。

============================================

華人之光 - 胡玲當選美國家科學院院士  

 美国国家科学院429日公布了本年度新增选华裔科学家胡玲院士。 即將在下個月度過61歲生日的胡玲现为美国加利福尼亚大学圣巴巴拉分校电子和计算机工程系、材料系教授,加利福尼亚纳米系统研究所主管科学事务的主任。 胡玲出生於1947年的515日,1969年畢業於Barnard College,取得學士學位,19711975年先後獲得哥倫比亞大學的碩士與博士學位。

 

在美國接受完整高等教育的胡玲,為華裔科學界津津樂道的是,她不但是台灣中研院數理科學組的第二位女院士,而且還是第一位女院士、有「中國居禮夫人」之稱的吳健雄博士晚年所指導的博士班學生。 四年前台灣中研院在選舉第25屆院士時,學術圈對胡玲顯赫的科學研究表現就給予高度推崇,對她最後繼吳健雄之後成為數理科學組的第二位女性院士,則傳為美談,認為吳健雄後繼有人。

 

美国国家科学院是在第145届年会上宣布新增选的院士和外籍院士名单的。包括胡玲和陶哲轩在内,美国国家科学院本年度新增选了72名院士和18名外籍院士。至此,美国国家科学院的院士总数增至2041人,外籍院士总数升至397人。 美国国家科学院创建于1863年,是美国科学界最高荣誉机构。

 

==========================================

Chicago to expand foreign language programs in Chinese, Arabic and Russian…

The Chicago Tribune (5/1, Ataiyero, Mihalopoulos) reports, "Chicago Public Schools (CPS) will expand its foreign language curriculum next year, teaching more students Chinese and Arabic and launching Russian in several schools." The district, which already claims "the largest [Chinese] program in the nation," is "re-allocat[ing] $1 million from its general fund" for the expansion, and expects "to hire about 15 new language teachers for 15 schools." In announcing the initiative, Mayor Richard Daley (D) "said he hoped that the announcement would lead to additional language curriculum funding from community and business leaders," and argued "that globalism is an important part of a student's education." Diane Zendejas, CPS's chief officer of the office of language and cultural education, agreed, saying "the expansion of the foreign language programs will help students be better world citizens."

 

============================================

仗义执言的女学者:王文畅教授对CSUN总教务长等人关于CNN和西藏问题的对话

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

The ‘fight’ among the dept Chairs started from me by an accident, reached the Provost (and the councilman), and it also ended up with my final replay to Harry.  The campus is quiet now. I organized this with Warren’s first, my last reply to the Provost, Chow’s strong argument, and then followed by the dates and time of others (omitted Chairs who told me that they support China Intuition very much and they mainly asked what I challenged in my letter which I used “Ancient Chinese language”).

 

By the way, I always tell my students how much I appreciate the last 200 years’ philosophical and scientific contributions to the world made by westerners.  

 

Thank you very much for your time, kindness, help, and support for me.

Wendy

 

Dear Paul:
I was very pleased to read your strong and well-argued response to Dr. Smith's censorious letter.  


Although I do not have all the background on Dr. Wen Wang's letter since it is one with Chinese language, I support fully the principle of academic freedom that you support.  

 

Apparently the spirit of McCarthyism is alive and well not only in Washington DC, but also among some on our campus.  So it is necessary and fitting that scholars like you remind the faculty that we need to stand together in defense of what freedom we have left in these difficult times.

Best personal regards,

Warren R. Bland, Chair of Economic Geography

 

Date: Wed 30 Apr 18:50:10 PDT 2008--To the Provost from Wen Wang

From: Wen Wang wwang@csun.edu

Subject: The U.S. to China Ambassador spoke the truth on Tibetan issue
To: harry hellenbrand <harry.hellenbrand@csun.edu>
Cc: 
profmike@profmike.com, yifei.sun@csun.edu, kay.pih@csun.edu, robert.chianese@csun.edu, Harold.Smith@csun.edu, zhixin.su@csun.edu, stan.charnofsky@csun.edu, paul.chow@csun.edu

Hello, All,

 

The U.S. to China Ambassador spoke in perfect Mandarin three nights ago on T.V. (channel 18, around 6:30 pm, was interviewed in Chinese) that

 

  1. “Very few Americans know the true situation of Tibet and the history of Tibetan people in China, because they were brain washed by the western media.

 

  1. The westerners who concerned about Tibet should study the history of Tibet/China instead of listening to the media here.  The current Chinese government should also make efforts on this issue and let the world know.

 

  1. The Chinese government needs to have a dialog with Dalai Lama.  To criticize a religious leader like him is not going to help the westerners.  

 

  1. The three U.S. Presidential candidates know very little about China, and so do most congressmen.  At the congress sessions the discussion on China usually only lasts, for example, 8 to 10 minutes, because they have many other issues to discuss. Their knowledge on China is not sufficient.”

 

In my view, most intellectuals in China believe that Mao’s rιgime did not let Dalai Lama stay was a mistake.   Nevertheless, most Chinese also recognized that the government has transformed Tibet from the Slavery condition to a Modern one (the lamas and monks do not develop technology etc, as you know).  The current government is inviting Dalai Lama in and working with him together.  And several western media reported the policemen who against the Tibetans were from Nepal.     

     

The world development is not an even one, according to the “Economic Long Wave” theory.  Using certain countries’ standards to criticize other countries policies is not going to help much, because the changes should be mainly made from within rather than from the outside.

     

China is behind the western world and it does have many problems.  However, when westerners are criticizing China’s human rights issue, they forgot the global wide, long-lasting, and severe European military invasions in the past; the 300 years’ Black Slavery history since around 1620; the 100 years’ killing off American Indians to only 1%; and almost 200 years (after U.S.- Mexican War) of colonizing and oppressing Mexican Americans.  Why the U.S. does not give CA back to Mexico?  And Tibet belonged to China since the Ming dynasty, which is much earlier.   

 

Most Chinese, not only Mainlanders, but also old generation American Chinese here, know that CNN’s comments are extremely Racist —we are not goons and thugs.  CNN dares not to say ONE bad word to Blacks because of its shameful slavery history, but it dares to say anything to the Chinese.    

 

My 1st Chinese letter sending to all dept Chairs was an accident due to my health condition that was witnessed by several colleagues in my dept, and I had apologized for that.  But it was not caused by my “itchy finger” (as Harry said).  I myself suffered severely during the Cultural Revolution under Mao’s wrong policy.  However, while China has its 30 years non-stop strong economic growth, some western politicians were threatened such as the French store and German Foundation.  Sayings like “This is our last chance to save the 1.3 billion Chinese” is directly related to the Tibetan riot and the disturbance of the Olympic passing torch.               

 

Sincerely yours, 

Wen Wang, Professor of Sociology

 

The Following are based on dates and time:

Mon 28 Apr 08:59:02 PDT 2008
From: Wen-chang Wang <wwang@csun.edu>
Subject:  CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?
To: Zhixin Su <zhixin.su@csun.edu>, Chinainst-l@csun.edu, IECREP-l@csun.edu, dept.chairs-l@csun.edu, yifei sun <yifei.sun@csun.edu>

Dear Zhixin,

My best friend Fanxi who teaches at Occidental College and I went to the protest against CNN on Saturday and we both want to say something about it to the Chinese faculty at the two institutions.  We must fight back together because it is not "a silent discrimination" after the civil rights movement but an open one.

Below is my Chinese letter and could you please publish it for me?  
(I’m having a heart problem and called 911 twice so can’t talk much).   

Best,
Wen Wang

 

Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:18:29 -0700
From: Harold Smith <Harold.Smith@csun.edu>  
Subject: RE: CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?  
To: "wwang@csun.edu" <wwang@csun.edu>, Zhixin Su
zhixin.su@csun.edu>, "Chinainst-l@csun.edu" <Chinainst-l@csun.edu>,
"IECREP-l@csun.edu" <IECREP-l@csun.edu>, "dept.chairs-l@csun.edu"
dept.chairs-l@csun.edu>, yifei sun <yifei.sun@csun.edu>
Cc: Craig L Finney <cfinney@csun.edu>, Helen Castillo
helen.castillo@csun.edu>
 
I believe this is an inappropriate email to be sent to department chairs. While you certainly have a right for your opinions and activity, to use a university related email list to further your cause is not consistent with the list serve purpose.

Harold Smith, Chair
Child and Adolescent Development

Date: Mon 28 Apr 16:41:34 PDT 2008--Paul Chow’s Strong Arguemnt
From: 
<paul.chow@csun.edu>
Subject: RE: CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?
To: Harold Smith <Harold.Smith@csun.edu>, wwang@csun.edu, Zhixin Su <zhixin.su@csun.edu>, Chinainst-l@csun.edu, IECREP-l@csun.edu, dept.chairs-l@csun.edu, yifei sun <yifei.sun@csun.edu>
Cc: Craig L Finney <cfinney@csun.edu>, Helen Castillo <helen.castillo@csun.edu>

Dear Dr. Smith:

I read your email response to Dr. Wang. I would like to remind you that the University is a place to encourage freethinking. The spirit of the University is to encourage free exchange of opinions. In fact, that is why a tenure system is needed.

Your suggestion to censor Dr. Wang for using the university email to exchange with other academics, particularly the chairs who suppose to set examples and lead their departments, is exactly opposite to this spirit. If you had chosen to debate what Dr. Wang stands for in her email, it would have been in line with the academic spirit. There have been precedents in our lifetime such as the society under the Nazi rule and our own country under the McCarthy doctrine.

But we have over come. Thanks for modern technology; the email has enhanced this free exchange. If controversial opinions were stifled on campuses as well as on email, the universities would lose their meaning. The progress of our society could change course and head backward. What is the purpose of having universities any more? As we have seen in industry, transfer of knowledge could be carried out simply by setting up workshops taught by technicians. It is just as efficient.

Let us take a look at our history as recent as during the civil right movement and the Vietnam War, not only the universities but also the public schools played a very important role. At the University of Texas at Austin, the faculty senate called a special session to discuss whether or not to sponsor the students’ demand to have a one-day moratorium on classes in order to stage a protest march against the Vietnam War. Those supported the demand argued in view of free expression, those against argued in your view. At the conclusion, we voted to support the students. On this campus when I came to join the faculty at Northridge in the following year, we held a moratorium of classes to have a dialogue with the students on civil right issues. As a result, this campus was transformed to be one of the first universities that recognize minority rights.

I am glad that you brought this up at this crucial time when the existence of universities is in question in view of website instructions and how-to-do workshops mentioned previously. I hope you agree with the spirit of free thoughts and free exchange of ideas and withdraw your objection.

Sincerely yours,

Paul Chow
Professor of Physics and Astronomy

Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Warren R Bland <warren.bland@csun.edu>
Subject: RE: CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?
To: paul.chow@csun.edu
Dear Paul:

I was very pleased to read your strong and well-argued response to Dr. Smith's censorious letter.  


Although I do not have all the background on Dr. Wen Wang's letter since it is one with Chinese language, I support fully the principle of academic freedom that you support.  Apparently the spirit of McCarthyism is alive and well not only in Washington DC but also among some on our campus.  So it is necessary and fitting that scholars like you remind the faculty that we need to stand together in defense of what freedom we have left in these difficult times.

Best personal regards,

Warren R. Bland

Chair of Economic Geography

 

Mon 28 Apr 22:51:51 PDT 2008
From: Zhixin Su <zhixin.su@csun.edu>
Subject: Re: CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?
To: wwang@csun.edu

Dear Wen, I hope you are feeling better now. All of us at the China Institute Executive Committee are concerned about your health and we hope that you will recover soon.  Could you give me a call when you have time?  I tried to call your home this evening, but your line is busy.  

 

I've forwarded your excellent article to all of our Chinese scholars.  I'm inviting some scholars to my American education class to make a presentation to my students this coming Wednesday, about their participation in the demonstration on April 19.

Talk to you soon, Zhixin

**************************************
Justine Zhixin Su, Ph.D.
Professor of Education
Director, The China Institute
Coordinator of International Programs
Room 265, University Hall
California State University
Northridge, CA91330-8222
(818) 677-2138 (Office)
(818) 677-4691 (Fax)

Mon 28 Apr 23:40:30 PDT 2008
From: Robert Louis Chianese <rchianese@csun.edu> 
Subject: RE: CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?
To: paul.chow@csun.edu, Harold Smith <Harold.Smith@csun.edu>, wwang@csun.edu, Zhixin Su <zhixin.su@csun.edu>, Chinainst-l@csun.edu, IECREP-l@csun.edu, dept.chairs-l@csun.edu, yifei sun <yifei.sun@csun.edu>
Cc: Craig L Finney <cfinney@csun.edu>, Helen Castillo <helen.castillo@csun.edu>

Dear Colleagues:

I do hope these emails can lead us to devise some sort of on campus discussion of the recent protests of CNN by Chinese here in America.

I for one want free discussion of issues on and off campus, but I do not remember calls for political action or support coming through the campus email system in the past.  A speaker on a contentious issue might be announced, but a political call to the campus community to  "fight back" collectively has never been issued I believe, except perhaps in the case of something like budget cuts to the CSUS. Even that has come through the CFA union, not the faculty itself.

For my own information, I would like to know what specific issues Dr. Wang addresses?  The nasty comments of one CNN commentator, or the reporting on CNN of China's actions in Tibet? They are very different things.

I want in my small way to help these two nations find ways to work together peacefully. I am worried that news coming out of China by US media has turned very negative and could spoil the Olympics by emphasis on problems, without appreciating and acknowledging the great strides the Chinese people are making in reaching out to the world and transforming their own country.  


Therefore I want US and our local CSUN reaction to events such as the CNN protest to be carefully understood and debated.  I doubt this can be done via email, and any call to action at this point seems premature.

Bob Chianese
Robert Louis Chianese,

Prof. of English

California State U., Northridge, CA
Art awakens us from the consensus trance.

 

Tue 29 Apr 07:56:13 PDT 2008
From: John W Plasek <wayne.plasek@csun.edu> 
Subject: Re: Nominations for Associate Dean---My qualification?
To: wwang@csun.edu

Dear Wendy,

I am so happy you are running for the associate deanship. I heartily endorse you, and please let me know if I can do anything to help you.
All best wishes,

Wayne

John Wayne Plasek
Dept. of Sociology
California State University
Northridge CA 91330-8318

 

Tue 29 Apr 08:32:39 PDT 2008 – To All From the Provost

From: harry hellenbrand harry.hellenbrand@csun.edu

Subject: Re: CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?
To: Robert Louis Chianese <rchianese@csun.edu>
Cc: "paul.chow@csun.edu" <paul.chow@csun.edu>, Harold Smith <Harold.Smith@csun.edu>, "wwang@csun.edu" <wwang@csun.edu>, Zhixin Su <zhixin.su@csun.edu>, "Chinainst-l@csun.edu" <Chinainst-l@csun.edu>, "IECREP-l@csun.edu" <IECREP-l@csun.edu>, "dept.chairs-l@csun.edu" <dept.chairs-l@csun.edu>, yifei sun <yifei.sun@csun.edu>, Craig L Finney <cfinney@csun.edu>, Helen Castillo <helen.castillo@csun.edu>

situations like these are hard for everyone because many are politically sympathetic with the issue, and there is murky territory between informing and political action. as i understand it, we are not to "state property" for direct political purposes since our status depends on institutional--but not individual--agnosticism. i understand the political action slides into permissable ideological discussion, etc. arguably it is fair game to discuss on such lists whether the university should take a stance, because discussion pertains to speech. so we need to pause a little before hitting send with ‘itchy finger’.

 

 

Tue 29 Apr 09:07:40 PDT 2008
From: Stan Charnofsky <stan.charnofsky@csun.edu>
Subject: Re: CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?
To: Robert Louis Chianese <rchianese@csun.edu>
Cc: paul.chow@csun.edu, Harold Smith <Harold.Smith@csun.edu>, wwang@csun.edu, Zhixin Su <zhixin.su@csun.edu>, Chinainst-l@csun.edu, IECREP-l@csun.edu, dept.chairs-l@csun.edu, yifei sun <yifei.sun@csun.edu>, Craig L Finney <cfinney@csun.edu>, Helen Castillo <helen.castillo@csun.edu>

I echo Bob's sentiments. 

Stan Charnofsky

 

Tue 29 Apr 09:20:03 PDT 2008
From<paul.chow@csun.edu>
Subject: RE: CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?
To: robert.chianese@csun.edu, Harold Smith <Harold.Smith@csun.edu>, wwang@csun.edu, Zhixin Su <zhixin.su@csun.edu>, Chinainst-l@csun.edu, IECREP-l@csun.edu, dept.chairs-l@csun.edu, yifei sun <yifei.sun@csun.edu>, Kathy Kies <kathykies2000@yahoo.com>
Cc: Craig L Finney <cfinney@csun.edu>, Helen Castillo <helen.castillo@csun.edu>, athyales@csun.edu

Bob:

To my understanding the whole thing started with the Tibetan movement, by whom I do not know.  Then an anchor man at CNN said in public that "Chinese are goons and thugs" on his program. When the Chinese, mainly those in this country, demanded an apology, CNN clarified that the vilification was not meant for all Chinese. They reiterated that it was meant for the leaders of that country.

I understand that was what Dr. Wang was talking about. Here are two articles on Tibet from the Australian point of view.

Paul Chow

A Personal Reflection
On Hypocrisy Over Tibet
By JOHN V. WHITBECK

I have been watching with growing amazement and
concern the assaults on the bizarrely quasi-religious
Olympic Torch as it has staggered through London,
Paris and San Francisco, as well as the self-righteous
pronouncements by certain European "leaders" (and even
by the European Parliament, the UN Secretary-General
and John McCain) that they will not be attending the
opening ceremony of the Olympics or are seriously
considering not attending or urging others not to
attend unless China bows to their "human rights"
demands.

Have they even been invited? Who needs them? Why,
aside from the obvious intention to give offense,
should the Chinese care?

I should make clear from the start that I am
profoundly sympathetic to Tibetand Tibetans. I have
had the privilege of meeting His Holiness the Dalai
Lama on two occasions, most recently when we both
spoke at the same human rights conference in Sweden,
and
the white kata which he hung around my neck on the

first occasion is proudly displayed in my study. In
person, he exudes a quiet, modest charisma and aura of
human saintliness that is captivating even to an
atheist -- unlike any other person whom I have ever
met. I wish that he could return to the Potala Palace
and his Norbulingka summer residence and that his
people could enjoy the broad cultural and
administrative autonomy which he seeks for them.

Furthermore, when I traveled in Tibet in 1981 (at a
time when I had already visited all but one of the
world's then existing countries), I found it, far and
away, the most fascinating place which I had ever
visited. It took my breath away in every sense.

Having said that, the current anti-Chinese frenzy in
the West, pursued in the guise of pro-Tibetan (and, to
a lesser extent, pro-Darfuri) human rights activism,
and the Western media's coverage of it reek of
hypocrisy.

As best I can tell, the recent violence occurred when
some ethnic Tibetans, understandably fed up with the
ever-increasing presence and domination of Han Chinese
in traditional Tibetan areas, exploded in frustration,
burned some Han Chinese shops and killed some Han
Chinese civilians. What, in such circumstances, would
one expect the Chinese authorities to do? When, by way
of example, some African-Americans in Watts and other
poor areas of Los Angeles exploded in frustration,
burned some white- and Korean-owned stores and
attacked some non-blacks, did the American police run
away? As I recall, they sought to restore order. So
have the Chinese authorities. (As a practical matter,
the most brutal images of repressive police action
against ethnic Tibetan protestors have not come from
China but from other countries, most notably Nepal.)

Can anyone seriously argue that Chinese treatment of
Tibetans, who have not been subject to either genocide
or ethnic cleansing and of whom the vast majority
continue to live on their ancestral lands, compares
unfavorably with the treatment accorded to the Native
Americans by the European settlers of North America or
the treatment accorded (and continuing to be accorded)
to the indigenous Palestinians by the Zionist settlers
of Palestine? Can anyone seriously argue that it is
even in the same league of evil and injustice?

With more than 50 recognized ethnic minorities
comprising roughly six percent of China's immense
population, Chinese government policy has always aimed
at cultural integration of all Chinese citizens rather
than at multiculturalism. Inevitably, some peoples are
deeply attached to their own distinct cultures and do
not wish to be integrated into another one. If Chinese
treatment of certain ethnic minorities justly merits
criticism, most serious observers would argue that
repressive measures against the Uighurs of Xinjiang
have been more severe than repressive measures against
Tibetans.

However, although there are many more Uighurs than
Tibetans, one hears very little about Uighurs in the
West. They are Muslims. Uighur nationalist movements
are on America's list of "terrorst" groups, and four
Uighurs swept up in Afghanistan were incarcerated at
Guantanamo for years, even long after being exonerated
as potential threats to America, before finally being
dumped in Albania, because no other country would
provide them asylum.

Furthermore, how reasonable is it to hold China
responsible for the human suffering resulting from
multiple separatist insurgencies and governmental
counterinsurgency measures in the Darfur region of
Sudan (because China invests in Sudan's oil industry?)
while not holding America and its Western
collaborators responsible for the far worse human
suffering resulting from America's invasions and
occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq and America's
unconditional financial and diplomatic support for
Israel's occupation of Palestine?

If the Chinese feel that the current anti-Chinese
frenzy in the West has its roots in jealousy at
China's 12% annual economic growth rate and its
increasing success in all aspects of world affairs,
seasoned with ample doses of racism and hypocrisy,
this would not be an irrational appreciation of the
situation.

At least with respect to its role in world affairs,
China has proven a rather gentle and benign dragon in
recent decades, focused on improving the economic
conditions and quality of life of its people rather
than on military aggression or full-spectrum
domination of mankind and the planet, even while its
strength and potential power have been growing
exponentially. Seeking personal emotional satisfaction
or domestic political advantage by gratuitously
sticking pins in the Chinese dragon is unlikely to
prove a wise course of action.

The world has enough problems already.
John V. Whitbeck, an international lawyer, is author
of "The World According to Whitbeck".
The Hypocrisy and Danger of Anti-China Demonstrations
by Floyd Rudmin

The Chinese Context

The
Chinese government is responsible for the well-being and security of one-fourth of humanity. Race riots and rebellion cannot be tolerated, not even when done by Buddhist monks.

Chinese Civilization was already old when the Egyptians began building pyramids. But the last 200 years have not gone well, what with two Opium Wars forcing China to import drugs, and Europeans seizing coastal ports as a step to complete colonial control, then the Boxer Rebellion, the collapse of the Manchu Dynasty, civil war, a brutal invasion and occupation by Japan, more civil war, then Communist consolidation and transformation of society, then Mao's Cultural Revolution. Such events caused tens of millions of people to die. Thus, China's recent history has good reasons why social order is a higher priority than individual rights. Race riots and rebellion cannot be tolerated.

Considering this context, China's treatment of its minorities has been exemplary compared to what the Western world has done to its minorities. After thousands of years of Chinese dominance, there still are more than 50 minorities in China. After a few hundred years of European dominance in North and South America, the original minority cultures have been exterminated, damaged, or diminished.

Chinese currency carries five languages: Chinese, Mongolian, Tibetan, Uigur, and Zhuang. In comparison, Canadian currency carries English and French, but no Cree or Inuktitut. If the USA were as considerate of ethnic minorities as is China, then the greenback would be written in English, Spanish, Cherokee and Hawaiian.

In China, ethnic minorities begin their primary schooling in their own language, in a school administered by one of their own community. Chinese language instruction is not introduced until age 10 or later. This is in sharp contrast to a history of coerced linguistic
assimilation in most Western nations. The Australian government recently apologized to the Aboriginal minority for taking children from their families, forcing them to speak English, beating them if they spoke their mother tongue. China has no need to make such apology to Tibetans or to other minorities.

China's one-child-policy seems oppressive to Westerners, but it has not applied to minorities, only to the Han Chinese. Tibetans can have as many children as they choose. If Han people have more than one child, they are punished.

There is a similar preference given to minorities when it comes to admission to universities. For example, Tibetan students enter China's elite Peking University with lower exam scores than Han Chinese students.

China is not a perfect nation, but on matters of minority rights, it has been better than most Western nations. And China achieved this in the historical context of restoring itself and recovering from 200 years of continual crisis and foreign invasion.

Historical Claims National boundaries are not natural. They all arise from history, and all history is disputable. Arguments and evidence can always be found to challenge a boundary. China has long claimed Tibet as part of its territory, though that has been hard to enforce during the past 200 years. The Dalai Lama does not dispute China's claim to Tibet. The recent race riots in Tibet and the anti-Olympics demonstrations will not cause China to shrink itself and abandon part of its territory. Rioters and demonstrators know that.

Foreign governments promoting Tibet separatism and demonstrators demanding Tibet independence should look closer to home.


Canadians can campaign for Quιbec libre. Americans can support separatists in Puerto Rico, Vermont, Texas, California, Hawaii, Guam, and Alaska. Brits can work for a free Wales, and Scotland for the Scots. French can help free Tahitians, New Caledonians, Corsicans, and the Basques. Spaniards can also back the Basques, or the Catalonians. Italians can help Sicilian separatists or the Northern League. Danes can free the Faeroe Islands. Poles can back Cashubians. Japanese can help Okinawan separatists, and Filipinos can help the Moros. Thai can promote Patanni independence; Indonesians can promote Acehnese independence. New Zealanders can leave the islands to the Maori;
Australians can vacate Papua. Sri Lankans can help Tamil separatists;
Indians can help Sikh separatists.

Nearly every nation has a separatist movement of some kind. There is no need to go to Tibet, to the top of the world, to promote ethnic separatism. China is not promoting separatism in other nations and does not appreciate other nations promoting separatism in China. The people most oppressed, most needing a nation of their own, are the Palestinians. There is a worthy project to promote and to demonstrate about.

 

Tue 29 Apr 09:54:53 PDT 2008
From"Matt Myerhoff" <Matt.Myerhoff@lacity.org>
Subject: Re: CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?
To: <rchianese@csun.edu>, <stan.charnofsky@csun.edu>
Cc: <cfinney@csun.edu>, <Chinainst-l@csun.edu>, <dept.chairs-l@csun.edu>, <Harold.Smith@csun.edu>, <helen.castillo@csun.edu>, <IECREP-l@csun.edu>, <paul.chow@csun.edu>, <wwang@csun.edu>, <yifei.sun@csun.edu>, <zhixin.su@csun.edu>

Please remove my email from this list

Matt Myerhoff, Communications Director for Councilman Greig Smith
818.613.2248
Matt.Myerhoff@lacity.org

 

Tue 29 Apr 09:43:01 PDT 2008
From"G. Michael Phillips, Ph.D." profmike@profmike.com

Subject: Re: CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?
To: paul.chow@csun.edu
Cc: robert.chianese@csun.edu, Harold Smith <Harold.Smith@csun.edu>, wwang@csun.edu, Zhixin Su <zhixin.su@csun.edu>, Chinainst-l@csun.edu, IECREP-l@csun.edu, dept.chairs-l@csun.edu, yifei sun <yifei.sun@csun.edu>, Kathy Kies <kathykies2000@yahoo.com>, Craig L Finney <cfinney@csun.edu>, Helen Castillo <helen.castillo@csun.edu>, athyales@csun.edu

The quote was "goons and thugs".  "goon" is not, to my knowledge, a
racist slur.
 
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=cnn+china+thugs&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f
 
While I agree that CNN's comments merited an apology, it does not
appear that they were invoking the racist language you report.

--Michael Phillips
Dept. of Finance

 

Tue 29 Apr 10:34:41 PDT 2008
From<paul.chow@csun.edu>
Apology is one thing.

But you cannot deny that your careless touch touched off some heated discussions and awareness which are healthy for the campus. This dead campus needs a shock. 
 
Thank you for touching the wrong key.
 
Paul

 

Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Robert Louis Chianese <rchianese@csun.edu>  
Subject: RE: CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?  
To: paul.chow@csun.edu

Paul:
 
I just got a request from Craig Finney not to use the Chairs list serve to discuss this issue. I will comply, hence this email just to you.
 
I am very supportive of helping the Chinese finesse their participation in the world at large--even if they don't want or need my help. I have taught last semester in Shanghai and found the experience personally gratifying and eye-opening. I have sponsored a Chinese scholar here this semester and hope to return to teach next fall.  
 
What I am worried about is the negative press China is getting, some of it justified and some not. I know i cannot influence this in any big way, but I'd like to imagine I can add my two cents into the discussion.

This process of bringing our two countries together beyond their economic connections will take great care and some time and effort. That's why I cautioned both the call for political action from Wang and the American reaction to Chinese protests here. We would seem to need a campus program of discussion and debate to have all of this clarified as much as possible.

All the best,
 
Bob
Robert Louis Chianese, Prof. of English, California State U., Northridge, CA
Art
awakens us from the consensus trance.

 

 Tue 29 Apr 12:06:30 PDT 2008
From<paul.chow@csun.edu>
Subject: RE: CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?
To: robert.chianese@csun.edu
Cc: zsu@csun.edu, wwang@csun.edu

Bob:

Not only China and the US need friends like you, the world would have been a more

harmonious place to live if half of us had looked at things like you do.

(The other half would have no one to argue with, ha, ha.) The mission of the China Institute is exactly that, namely to promote understanding.
I appreciate your comments.
Paul

 

Tue 29 Apr 12:20:03 PDT 2008
From: Zhixin Su <zhixin.su@csun.edu>
Subject: RE: CSUN can you publish my Chinese letter?
To: paul.chow@csun.edu, robert.chianese@csun.edu
Cc: zsu@csun.edu, wwang@csun.edu

Thank you, Paul and Bob, for your concern and support to the Chinese faculty and scholars here.  Although Dr. Wang only meant to send it to me and some other Chinese faculty, we strongly support her thoughts and writings against the racial remarks made by Cafferty at CNN.  Our Chinese visiting scholars and students also participated in the demonstration at CNN on April 19.  In fact, I'm going to invite some of them to my class for a PPT presentation about this event tomorrow, as it's consistent with one of the major themes of my course on diversity and equality in education.

All the best,

 

Justine Su

Professor at School of Education

Director of China Institution

 

Date: Wed 30 Apr 18:50:10 PDT 2008--To the Provost from Wen Wang

From: Wen Wang wwang@csun.edu

Subject: The U.S. to China Ambassador spoke the truth on Tibetan issue
To: harry hellenbrand <harry.hellenbrand@csun.edu>
Cc: 
profmike@profmike.com, yifei.sun@csun.edu, kay.pih@csun.edu, robert.chianese@csun.edu, Harold.Smith@csun.edu, zhixin.su@csun.edu, stan.charnofsky@csun.edu, paul.chow@csun.edu

Hello, All,

 

The U.S. to China Ambassador spoke in perfect Mandarin three nights ago on T.V. (channel 18, around 6:30 pm, was interviewed in Chinese) that

 

  1. “Very few Americans know the true situation of Tibet and the history of Tibetan people in China, because they were brain washed by the western media.

 

  1. The westerners who concerned about Tibet should study the history of Tibet/China instead of listening to the media here.  The current Chinese government should also make efforts on this issue and let the world know.

 

  1. The Chinese government needs to have a dialog with Dalai Lama.  To criticize a religious leader like him is not going to help the westerners.  

 

  1. The three U.S. Presidential candidates know very little about China, and so do most congressmen.  At the congress sessions the discussion on China usually only lasts, for example, 8 to 10 minutes, because they have many other issues to discuss.”

 

In my opinion, most intellectuals in China believe that Mao’s rιgime did not let Dalai Lama stay was a mistake.   Nevertheless, most Chinese also recognized that the government has transformed Tibet from the Slavery condition to a Modern one (the lamas and monks do not develop technology etc, as you know).  The current government is inviting Dalai Lama in and working with him together.   

     

The world development is not an even one, according to the “Economic Long Wave” theory.  Using certain countries’ standards to criticize other countries policies is not going to help much, because the changes should be mainly made from within rather than from the outside.

     

China is behind the western world and it does have many problems.  However, when westerners are criticizing China’s human rights issue, they forgot the global wide, long-lasting, and severe European military invasions in the past, and the 300 years’ Black Slavery history since around 1620; the 100 years’ killing off American Indians to only 1%; and almost 200 years (after U.S.- Mexican War) of colonizing and oppressing Mexican Americans.  Why the U.S does not give CA back to Mexico? And Tibet belonged to China since Ming dynasty, which is much earlier.   

 

Most Chinese, not only Mainlanders, but also old generation American Chinese here, know that CNN’s comments are extremely Racist—we are not goons and thugs.  CNN dares not to say ONE bad word to Blacks because of its shameful slavery history, but it dares to say anything to Chinese.    

 

My 1st Chinese letter sending to all dept Chairs was an accident due to my health condition that was witnessed by several colleagues in my dept, and I had apologized for that.  But it was not caused by my “itchy finger”.   I myself suffered severely during the Cultural Revolution under Mao’s wrong policy.  However, while China has its 30 years non-stop strong economic growth, some western politicians were threatened such as the French store and German Foundation.  Sayings like “This is our last chance to save the 1.3 billion Chinese” is directly related to the Tibetan riot and the disturbance of the Olympic passing torch.               

 

Sincerely yours, Wen Wang, Professor of Sociology

============================================

教授来稿 - “科学人才观”浅说 (邓伟志)

                     

()六亿神州尽舜尧

“功以才成,业由才广。”各项事业要发展,都要靠人才来带动、推动和拉动。

一提人才,就免不了说到那些艺术明星、学术名人、社会名流。殊不知,他们只是人才汪洋大海中的“一粟”。如果只把他们当人才,那就是片面的人才观,畸形的人才观,不科学的人才观。

人,一切正常的人,只要能按正常人的生活方式生活,照正常人的学习方式学习,依正常人的行为方式作为,就能为社会做出不平常的贡献,成为不平常的人才。

平凡出伟大。伟大未必出伟大。耀眼的珍珠无不是出自于不起眼的蛤蜊。大家想想看,历史上有多少伟大人物生不出伟大来,世界上有多少从小就按伟人的生活方式生活的人,到头来没有成为伟人,成了“扶不起来的刘阿斗”。就是在世袭制的情况下,也“世袭”不了多少代。“龙生龙,凤生凤”,是反科学的。

相反的,平凡出伟大则是规律,是铁的规律。俗话说:“三百六十行,行行出状元。”这一观点是迈向科学人才观的第一步。在封建社会里,能喊出这样宏亮的声音,是难能可贵的。

如今,学科分工越来越细,社会分工越来越细。职业门类有消有长,消长相抵后,远不止360行。新华社说,当代中国至少有两万种职业。在两万种职业中,不管哪一种,都能成人才。养鸡的能成鸡大王。驯虎的能当王中王。你养鸡下蛋少,他养鸡下蛋多;你养鸡下的蛋,蛋黄苍白,他养鸡下的蛋,蛋黄呈桔红色:还不承认人家是人才吗?你见了老虎来了吓得跑,老虎见他来了,老老实实站着听指挥:还不承认人家是人才吗?“一手鲜,吃遍天。”只要能在自己平凡的岗位上,精通一门手艺,就是能工巧匠,就是十足的人才。只要有一技之长,就是人才。不承认他们是人才,就是不懂得科学是从哪里来的。实践出真知,也必然会生出真知的载体——人才。

这一行的状元与那一行的状元之间,有可比性,又没可比性。长期以来,有个数学家与物理学家谁了不起的争论,能说清楚吗?这等于问:是一斤大还是一尺大?只有用“行行出状元”一说,才能解释明白。

上海有所举世闻名的高校——复旦大学,曾有位副校长是个工人。对此,不管是“批左”,还是“批右”的时候,都没有人说个“不”字,老实讲,也没有谁敢说个“不”字。发明一两种电光源就可当教授,发明两三种电光源就可当院士。工人蔡祖泉发明了几十种电光源,还不能当大学校长吗?

爱因斯坦、莎士比亚在未成名前都是普通人。爱因斯坦在提出狭义相对论以后,想谋个讲师的位子当当,都有困难。莎士比亚在成名前是个剧场的勤杂工。再早是什么人?是同当今中国所谓的“农民工”没有任何区别的“农民工”。可后来呢?就不用说了。

“圣人不曾高,众人不曾低。”(李贽)我们应当理直气壮地承认:正常的人都能成人才。古人早就指出,只看文凭,只看学历,人才就少; 不看文凭,不看学历,注重实际,人才就多。在心胸狭窄的人手下,人才就少;在心胸宽阔的人眼里,人才就多。千里马常有,而伯乐不常有。伯乐不到,千里马就少;伯乐一到,养马场里的马就会被选光了。汉朝有好几个人都先后说过一句意思差不多的箴言,叫做:“十室之邑,必有俊士。”有些人即使一时不是才,那也是准人才,是人才的预备队员。

正常的人能成人才,那么,不正常的人呢?比如说残疾人。残疾人成才的难度大,但是,决不是说不能成才。只要他们身残心不残,照样能成大才。任何人的大脑都是信息加工厂。人采集外界信息靠五官。眼是第一官。人获得的大部分信息是靠视觉采集来的。盲人视力不好,采集的信息量少。可是,正因为视力差,就逼着把听力锻炼得比正常人要好得多。中国有位盲人,能学许多名人的说唱,惟妙惟肖,连被摹仿的名人自己都佩服得五体投地,原因就在于他的听力特别好。2008年初,纽约州选出一位能力非凡的盲人当州长,举世瞩目。聋哑人听力不好,也促使他们把视力练得特别好。中国有许多聋哑人成为优秀的服装设计师,在国际上获大奖。荷兰出过很多名画家,却少有音乐大师, 据说是因为他们那个民族的听力差、视觉就发达有关。浙江有位无臂书法家。脚写的字,比许多人用手写的还好。残疾人中出奇才。

残疾人大脑好,没智障,如果有智障,能成才吗?也能。这只要看一看在上海举办的世界特奥会上,来自各国的精彩表演就理解了。有智障的人,抽象思维能力差,形象思维能力不见得差。武汉有位智障人指挥交响乐,驰名中外,难道还不是人才吗?

是人都能成人才的命题,不仅符合客观实际,而且为“以人为本”的思想奠定了基石。只有认为人人能成才,方可“以人为本”。人不是才,何必以人为本?只有认为人人能成才,方能“民为贵”,方能以民为天,方能聚焦民生,方能“以天下治天下”。否则,以官为本,以少数人为本。只有认为人人能成才,方才需要走群众路线,树立群众观点,而不会把天下安危系在少数人身上。

“六亿神州尽舜尧”。五十年前,在中国只有六亿人口时,一位伟人所说的这句话,是诗篇,也是理论。

                      

()“科学人才观”的八大要点

   (1) 是人就能成人才

         ——人才来源的广泛性

    从人脑细胞的情况看,人的脑量是有差异的。可是,有点差异在一般情况下,并不影响人的思维能力。因为,人脑除了运动区、语言区以外,还有一个尚未启动的庞大的“静区”,不存在什么脑细胞不够用的问题。这是人才广泛性的生理前提。当然,脑量太少,成了没脑儿,也不行!

    过去讲“高贵者最愚蠢,卑贱者最聪明”,固然是极而言之,如果认为“高贵者”与“ 卑贱者”都聪明,或者说高贵者“较”愚蠢,卑贱者“较”聪明,那还是有道理的。这点改动并不是什么自作聪明,而是真理标准教给我们的高明,是真理标准提醒我们:不拘一格降人才。

(2)闻道有先后,术业有专攻

——人才水平的层次性

人的五个手指不一样长。人才无疑也是有大小之分的。九百年前,苏轼就讲过“才有大小”, “才各有小大”。 “大小”也好, “小大”也罢,都说明人才的水平是相对的,是有层次性的。社会上,既有“智者千虑,必有一失”的智者,也有“智者千虑,必有‘三’失” 的智者。不用说,“三失”的就没有“一失”的水平高嘛!有高低是正常的,有高低才有梯队,有结构,才是错落有致。只有一类、一档人才,是难以取得全胜的。

 (3)世上只有地才,没有天才

——育才上的实践性

    我们是唯物主义的反映论者,而不是先验论者。我们认为,人的才能是后天形成的,而不是天上掉下来的,也不是娘胎里带来的。天才就是勤奋,天才就是汗水。天才来源于实践,来源于丰富的实践,来源于长期的实践。迄今已经发现了几十个被动物带大的孩子,其中还有个王子。他们到好几岁以后,仍然是用四肢行走,不会说话。他们从人孩变成了狼孩、豹孩、猴孩。

人的直接实践总是有限的,大量的知识是间接获得的。这就得学习。这就得受教育。能受良好的教育,容易成大才; 不能受良好的教育,只能成小才。人都是学而知之。钢琴家朗朗如果没有受过特殊的教育和他自己的努力接受教育,怕也成不了今天的朗朗。刘翔跑得快,也是同他所受的教育分不开的。既然教育是提炼人才的大熔炉,这就迫切要求教育要公平。教育不公平,就难以人人成才。

孟子曰:“得天下英才而教育之”。这话只说对了一半。应当是得天下“人”而教育之,使之成英才。“材无不可范而成。”“范”,就是规范、规律,传授规范、规律,就是教育。实践是成才之父,教育是成才之母。即使是千里马,如果不喂它饲料,不继续训练,那也跑不动、跑不好的。

    (4)十个人才九个傻

——识才上的两点论

    智莫难于知人。才能也体现在识才上。除了死人不再出错外,人没有不出错的。可是,我们对人才的宣传多有片面性。只说有才的一面,不说无才的一面,把人才,尤其是把大人才描写得完美无缺,高不可攀。这是不利于人才涌现的。

“黄金无足色,白璧有微瑕。”任何人才,“天才”, “超天才”,都有傻的一面,都有不足之处,甚至有的还有很坏的一面。能够做到小事糊涂,大事不糊涂,就很好了。实际上,人才往往是糊涂与不糊涂参半。在此专业、此领域是巨人,在彼专业、彼领域很可能是矮子。数学家陈景润在数学上出类拔萃,可是在别的方面确实傻得可爱。19783月我有机会天天见到他,他说起政治来,多有微笑,鲜有宏论。有些学者言必称马克斯••韦伯。马克斯••韦伯的理论在东西方是热门。可是,谁都知道马克斯••韦伯干过不少“伤”西方之“风”、 “败”西方之“俗”的丑事!爱因斯坦坐公共汽车,忽然发现口袋里没钱,适遇盲人向他乞讨,他不仅不施舍,竟偷了盲人碗里的钱买汽车票。这在今天,如果他是学生是不是要给他个什么处分呢?我1980年拜访过一位曾经与好几届国家领导照过像,上过大报头版的大学者。说起他的成就来,可以说上三天三夜,说实在的对他的伟大成就我也没水平说清楚,可是说起他的失误来,我也能讲上三个小时。历史上,集“能臣”与 “奸雄”于一体的,岂止曹操一人!为尊者讳,为有才者讳,不是唯物主义的老实态度。两点论才是科学的。

看到人才的短处,也用不着大惊小怪。对人才,不因马瘦而失马,不能求全责备,不能因人才之所短,而弃其所长。成大功者不计小苛。前面讲到的那位大学者,“三天三夜”是72小时。3小时与72小时之比,失误还是极小的嘛!识才者应该是“不以一眚掩大德。”( <左传>)香料的成品是香的,可香料厂的原材料多是臭不可闻的。有眼力的人,“必采秽薮之芳蕙”(<抱朴子>)不仅如此,还应当看到,愈是有才的人,愈是有人夸大他们的缺点,愈是容易遭人妒忌和中伤。面对这种情况,人们更应当冷静,透过现象看本质,看主流,要网开一面,有时还要网开三面。这才是识才者的胸怀。

不挑剔人才的缺点,不等于放纵他们的缺点。不论是才上的缺陷,还是德上的污点,都要引导他们注意克服。不过,也应当看到,有些时候,优点的延长变了了缺点,在克服其缺点时,力求恰如其分,不要砍过了头,连优点也砍伤了。辩证的人才观才是科学人才观。

 

(5)“外举不弃仇”

——举才上的客观性

我们有些人最能听得进的是“内举不失亲”,可是,他们很容易忘记在“内举不失亲”前面,还有一句更有分量的话,叫做: “外举不弃仇”。这两句话出自于两千五百年前。晋侯问大臣祁溪:“谁能接你的班?”祁溪说:“解狐。”晋侯说:“解狐不是你的仇人吗?” 祁溪说:“你是问我谁能任职,不是问我谁是仇人?”不料,解狐未任职就死了。祁溪又举了祁午。晋侯说:“祁午不是你的儿子吗?” 祁溪说:“你是问我谁能任职,不是问我谁是我的儿子?”请看,祁溪是先举的仇人啊!如今很多头头,不要说不能做到“弃仇”,只要跟他提点不同意见,他也会找个借口,把人赶走。喜欢奴才,不爱人才,是当今举才上的一大毒瘤。  

    在知识界,